MERICS – China’s fragile online spaces for debate

This analysis is part of “China Spektrum,” a joint research project with the China Institute of the University of Trier (CIUT) funded by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. As part of this project, we analyze expert and public debates in China. Learn more about…
Thea Metz · 3 months ago · 4 minutes read


```html

Navigating China's 2024: A Balancing Act of Policy and Public Perception

Economic Anxieties and the Limits of Policy Buzzwords

2024 witnessed a flurry of policy initiatives from Beijing, a determined effort to project confidence amidst domestic socio-economic concerns. From the National People's Congress to the Central Economic Work Conference, buzzwords like "reform," "modernization," and "higher quality growth" echoed through official channels, promising solutions to public anxieties surrounding jobs and economic stability.

Despite measures aimed at revitalizing the private sector and the real estate market, along with blueprints for pension reform, family policy, and hukou relaxation, the impact remained limited. These long-awaited policy pronouncements, while addressing expert recommendations, seemed to fall short of public expectations.

Public confidence in the economy and job market remained fragile, underscored by pervasive censorship surrounding economic discussions. This suppression of open dialogue serves as a stark indicator of the challenges facing China's leadership. The disconnect between official narratives and the anxieties voiced by experts and citizens reveals a growing chasm fueled by perceived policy failings and the potential for social unrest.

A Stifled Dialogue: Censorship and the Red Lines of Economic Critique

While some experts cautiously voiced concerns and debated optimal revitalization strategies, harsher critiques of economic woes remained off-limits. The swift censorship of economists Gao Shanwen and Fu Peng's remarks on the bleak labor market exemplifies the tight control over economic narratives. Even historical articles by well-known economists vanished from the internet, while critical private comments landed academics under investigation.

This climate of censorship fuels public skepticism towards positive official messaging. The resurgence of online phrases like "garbage time of history," alongside "lying flat" and "involution," reflects dwindling optimism about the future. While authorities attempted to counter these narratives with pro-government articles, the underlying challenges of youth unemployment and job insecurity persist.

The precarious state of local government finances adds another layer of unease. The circulation of documents referencing "smashing pots and selling iron" to avoid debt defaults, alongside reports of arbitrary fines levied on small businesses, exposed the financial strain on localities. Although censorship intervened, government responses included debt relief and guidelines against "profit-driven inspections," acknowledging the gravity of the situation.

Social Policy Shortfalls and Shifting Public Expectations

The historic raising of the retirement age, while aimed at addressing the pension deficit, sparked heated debate. Older workers feared job displacement, while younger generations worried about shrinking opportunities, both united by anxieties about securing well-paying jobs to build pension benefits.

Similarly, new birth and family support measures, lauded by state media, faced public scrutiny. Doubts lingered about their efficacy in alleviating pressures on prospective parents amidst economic uncertainties. Reports of local authorities inquiring about women's pregnancy plans further fueled concerns, highlighting changing social attitudes and resistance to intrusive government interventions.

Long-promised hukou reforms, while acknowledged as crucial for addressing structural inequalities, continued to fall short of expectations. Despite pledges of equal access to public services, the system continues to create disparities between rural and urban populations.

Social Unrest and the Shadow of "Revenge on Society" Attacks

A series of violent attacks across the country in 2024, categorized as "revenge on society" attacks, exposed deep-seated social grievances. Public questioning of the underlying causes, fueled by economic stress and structural inequalities, prompted a response from Xi Jinping himself, emphasizing "social stability measures" and risk control.

The ensuing directives to local authorities to identify potential risks, including individuals experiencing "five frustrations" – failed investments, relationship issues, marginalization, emotional instability, and mental illness – sparked concerns about excessive surveillance and its potential to disproportionately target vulnerable citizens.

Youthful Revelry Meets Political Paranoia

Beyond expressions of disillusionment like "lying flat," young Chinese largely focus on seeking secure jobs and opportunities. However, even benign youthful activities, like Halloween celebrations and mass cycling trips, became targets of government scrutiny, revealing a deep-seated fear of potential political dissent.

The heavy police presence at Halloween events in 2024, fueled by memories of previous costumed displays of social discontent, showcased the government's oversensitivity to perceived threats. Similarly, the initial encouragement of night-cycling trips quickly transformed into restrictions as the events grew in scale, highlighting the authorities' anxieties about large gatherings.

The specter of the 2022 "White Paper" protests, largely erased from public memory, continues to haunt the leadership, shaping their responses to any hint of collective action, even in the realm of youthful recreation.

```